People Have Few Protections Against Law Enforcement Civil Asset Forfeiture Practices

Imagine a world where police officers regularly confiscate property from civilians, based only on officers’ accusations of criminal conduct. Imagine that these allegations are never examined by a judge and that charges of criminal conduct are often never even filed.

Unfortunately, you don’t have to imagine anything, because that is the world we live in.

This is the topsy-turvy world of civil seizure and forfeiture – where just the suspicion of criminal conduct by a law enforcement officer is enough for the seizure of property. Just an accusation can be sufficient proof to seize, for example, a car, a house, or a purse containing currency – and for the property’s eventual forfeiture to the government.

The scope of this confiscation has become so large that, in recent years, the value of the property seized just by the federal government outweighs the value of property stolen by burglars.

Protections against seizure and forfeiture are so fragile that they encourage law enforcement officers to treat every roadside encounter like an interaction with a career criminal. The law encourages the investigation, detention, and search of motorists for crimes that have nothing to do with automobile travel. The possession of cash, for instance, serves as sufficient evidence that the cash is related to crime and therefore justifies its confiscation.

Why are police are encouraged to pursue seizure and forfeiture of currency and other valuable goods? Because a big portion of that confiscated property gets funneled into law enforcement budgets. Street-level officers are praised by their commanding officers when they execute cash seizures. Predictably, this practice drives a wedge between law enforcement officers and honest, law-abiding citizens. Some motorists will start viewing officers as predators, while some law enforcement officers will start to see those whom they are sworn to protect and serve as prey.

Where are our public officials who are supposed to look out for justice? They must balance budgets and are constantly on the lookout for new sources of revenue. Law enforcement agencies can lighten their budget burdens by increasing the take from seizure and forfeiture. That makes policymakers resistant to good-government types who call for reforms to seizure and forfeiture – reforms that would squeeze the bottom lines of government budgets.

You might be interested in:
Walberg Introduces the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act | Civil Asset Forfeiture Corruption | U.S. Marshals Service hires custodian to hold crypto seized in criminal activity | Data Center Mergers & Acquisitions: Post-Transaction Integration & Liabilities | How and When Will I Get Back Property Seized by Police? | How do you protect your assets from seizures and forfeitures? | GDPR Challenges for U.S.-Based Data Centers | Asset Forfeitures Fund New York DA’s Office Bonuses | Lynchburg CA Mike Doucette on Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | My Voice: Private property at risk in South Dakota | Asset Forfeiture Not So Helpful to Crime-Fighting | The Heat: US Civil Asset Forfeiture Controversy Part 2 | An Overview of Recent State-Level Forfeiture Reforms | Responding to the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem | Energy Storage Solutions & Battery Innovations for Data Centers: A Sustainable Future | Implementing SOC 2 Type II in Colocation Environments: Steps & Pitfalls | Tennessee Corruption Case Raises Questions about Forfeiture and Police Office Culture | Here’s what happens to Russian oligarch yachts after they’re seized | Navigating Data Center Land Use Entitlements: A Comprehensive Guide | 5G Infrastructure Partnerships: Data Center Opportunities & Legal Risks | Civil Forfeiture – The Innocent Owner | Data Center Mergers & Acquisitions: Legal Due Diligence Guide | Police keep taking more and more stuff from people without charging them for crimes | Securing the Edge: New Approaches to Data Center Cybersecurity

You might also like:
Criminal Forfeiture Attorney Los Angeles – Rucci Law | After FBI seizure of safe deposit boxes in Beverly Hills, legal challenges mount | Texas Nurse Sues Feds Over Abusive Civil Forfeiture Practices | What is Civil Asset Forfeiture? | For The Record: “Seized” | Seized Cash Defense – Rucci Law | Watch California Cops Steal Every Penny from an Innocent Family | Seized Property Case – Rucci Law | Responding to the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem | How much civil asset forfeiture will Holder’s new policy actually prevent? | This Is How the Government Robs the Innocent | Civil Asset Forfeiture | Our Government Overlords | Dallas K-9 Instrumental in Civil Forfeiture of $106,000 at Love Field Airport Despite There Being no Arrest or Crime | Lessons from Landmark Civil Rights Cases | The Supreme Court Has Limited How Much Private Property States Can Seize | A new twist on asset forfeiture | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Twelfth in a Series: Love Field Update) | Policing For Profit:How Civil Asset Forfeiture Has Perverted American Law Enforcement | Can the Trump Administration Use Asset Forfeiture Funds to Build the Border Wall? | Federal Forfeiture Defense Strategies – Protecting Your Assets | Sen. Rand Paul on Health Care and Civil Asset Forfeiture (7-20-17) | Feds auction $13.5M worth of Silk Road bitcoins | Justice Fights Back Against Civil Asset Forfeiture Corruption | Walberg Champions Amendment to Rein in Civil Forfeiture Abuse | House Forfeiture Attorney – Rucci Law