Trump pardon unwinds some Manafort forfeitures
Justice Department drops efforts to seize 3 properties of former Trump campaign manager at center of Mueller probe.
Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort arrives for a hearing at the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse.
The Justice Department has abandoned its efforts to seize three properties owned by Paul Manafort, who received a pardon from President Donald Trump in December. | Mark Wilson/Getty Images
By JOSH GERSTEIN
02/26/2021 06:37 PM EST
The Justice Department has abandoned its efforts to seize three properties owned by Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, who received a pardon from the former president in December.
The real estate includes Manafort’s 10-bedroom, 6-bath home at Bridgehampton, Long Island, valued at $11 million on Zillow, as well as an apartment in New York’s Chinatown and a townhouse in Brooklyn.
“The department has determined that due to President Trump’s full and unconditional pardon of Paul Manafort, it is necessary to dismiss the criminal forfeiture proceedings involving the four assets which were the subject of the on-going forfeiture ancillary proceedings,” a Justice Department spokesman said Friday afternoon, following a court filing announcing the decision.
It is unclear what portion, if any, of the assets will return to Manafort as a result of the Justice Department’s conclusion that Trump’s pardon effectively nullified forfeitures that were not complete at the time he issued it late last year. Most or all of the property is likely to be sold to repay his debts and it is unclear how much money will be left over, if any.
A Manafort associate welcomed the development, but said it was unclear whether the longtime lobbyist and political consultant would benefit financially from the action.
“The government did what it had to do. It’s the law,” said the associate, who asked not to be named. “To Paul, it’s not a windfall. The question is whether it actually worth anything to him at the end of the day. All these creditors have offsets.”
The three properties as well as a Manafort bank account had been tangled in litigation long after Manafort was convicted on eight felony charges in federal court in Virginia in 2018 and later pleaded guilty to other charges as part of a plea deal with prosecutors from special counsel Robert Mueller’s office.
U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson dismissed the forfeiture litigation and ended the associated forfeitures in an order issued shortly after the government’s filing Friday.
📣 Want more POLITICO? Download our mobile app to save stories, get notifications and more. In iOS or Android.
The total value of the assets Manafort agreed to forfeit in his plea deal is hard to assess. Some press accounts put the total at $26 million or more, but those figures were wildly inflated because the related mortgages were not accounted for. One court order referred to $11 million in forfeiture, but the real value would rise or fall depending on the value of the real estate.
A Trump Tower apartment Manafort agreed to give up may have netted little or nothing for the government because of a mortgage on that property. The feds do appear to have successfully completed their seizure of one bank account Manafort maintained as well as a life insurance policy.
The legal wrangling over the other Manafort assets was not pursued by him, but by a Chicago-based bank that was one of his biggest lenders — The Federal Savings Bank — and by another more obscure lender. Usually, lenders with a mortgage get priority even when the federal government sweeps in to seize ill-gotten gains.
However, the Justice Department resisted those claims, suggesting that the Chicago bank may have been privy to Manafort’s activities as an unregistered foreign agent, tax evasion or other crimes he admitted to in the 2018 deal.
The bank’s founder and former CEO, Stephen Calk, was indicted on a bank bribery charge for allegedly getting Manafort’s loan approved in exchange for consideration for a post on the Trump campaign and a job in the administration. Calk was named to campaign economic board, but never got an administration job.
After Trump issued the pardon, the Justice Department asked for a series of continuances to assess its impact on the forfeitures. Some legal experts said that any forfeitures that had been completed before the pardon would be irreversible without an act of Congress, but that those still being litigated were nullified by the president’s act of clemency.
Former Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said the way Manafort’s plea deal was structured, the government could seize his assets through civil proceedings, but the Justice Department filing Friday made no mention of that.
Manafort was sentenced to a total of seven-and-a-half years in prison on the various charges he was found guilty of or pleaded guilty to. However, under a coronavirus-related program to reduce prison populations, he was released to home detention last May, after less than two years in custody. Trump’s pardon followed on Dec. 23.
Related:
Sanctioned oligarch accuses U.S. of stealing his assets, vows to fight in Russian court | Fighting Back against Government Theft | SLA Best Practices: Negotiations for Uptime, Redundancy, and Tenant Protections | EDITORIAL: Civil asset forfeiture horror story shows need for reform | Data Center Modular Builds: Easing Compliance & Speed-to-Market in Tight Real Estate | Federal Judge Effectively Ends Albuquerque’s Civil Asset Forfeiture Program as Too Focused on Revenue and Not on Due Process | Attorney General Sessions Announces Policy to Increase Civil Forfeiture | Policing for Profit Visualized: How Big Is Civil Forfeiture? (Institute for Justice) | Multi-Cloud vs. Single-Cloud Strategies: Legal, Operational, and Real Estate Implications | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-112.000 – Administrative And Judicial Forfeiture | Mergers & Acquisitions in Data Centers: Legal Due Diligence & Deal Structuring | Civil Forfeiture: Can the Government Really Seize and Take Ownership of My Company’s Assets? | Federal Loophole Thwarts State Curbs on Police Seizures of Property | Navigating Civil Asset Forfeiture (The Court Process) | The Surprising Truth About ‘Dirty Money’ | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-119.000 – Asset Forfeiture Approval, Consultation, And Notification Requirements | Divestitures & Carve-outs in Data Centers: Legal Strategies for Asset Separation | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-120.000 – Attorney Fee Forfeiture Guidelines | Michigan Bans The Cops From Seizing Your Property Without Conviction | Mitigating Legal Risks Through Robust Data Center Contracts | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Eighth in a Series) | Data Center Contracts & SLAs: Legal Drafting for Performance & Protection | Key Legal Considerations in Dat…
Related:
The Surprising Truth About ‘Dirty Money’ | Pima County Sheriff – Talking With Civil Asset Forfeiture Recipient | Clarence Thomas vs. Jeff Sessions on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Civil Forfeiture: Legalized Theft by Police & Government | The IRS has seized $1.2 billion worth of cryptocurrency this fiscal year – here’s what happens to it | Class Action Against FBI For Abusive Seizure and CIVIL FORFEITURE! Viva & Barnes HIGHLIGHT! | County Sheriff Slapped with Civil Forfeiture Lawsuit | Civil Forfeiture Highway Shakedowns in Tennessee | Sheriff Under Scrutiny over Drug Money Spending | Professional Partnership Agreement Attorney Legal Services | Reforming Civil Asset Forfeiture | Dallas County Member Protests Use of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Urban Reform | Institute for Justice’s Scott Bullock Discusses Civil-Asset Forfeiture Abuse | Kansas Asset Forfeiture Investigation Part 1 | Federal Civil Asset Forfeiture | Civil asset forfeiture is a dangerous tool | Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong. | Asset Forfeiture Legal Resources | Alabama Passes Asset Forfeiture Accountability Bill | Civil Asset Forfeiture, Blacks Law Definitions and the Native Truth | Sentence First; Verdict Afterwards: Civil Asset Forfeiture Ruins Lives on Basis of Allegations | Can the Trump Administration Use Asset Forfeiture Funds to Build the Border Wall? | Civil Asset Forfeiture Defense Strategies | Civil Asset Forfeiture: Grading the States
