Warrant of arrest issued against seized funds from Bank of Saipan
DISTRICT Court for the NMI Magistrate Judge Heather Kennedy issued a warrant of arrest in rem Friday against funds seized from two Bank of Saipan accounts in 2019 for wire fraud and money laundering totaling $310,276.26.
According to an online legal dictionary, “in rem” is Latin for “against the thing,” and “refers to a lawsuit or other legal action directed toward a property, rather than toward a particular person.”
Judge Kennedy issued the warrant of arrest pursuant to “Rule G(3)(b)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.”
She commanded the U.S. Marshals Service and or any other duly authorized law enforcement officer “to arrest and take into your possession the above-captioned defendant properties by serving a copy of this Warrant on the custodian in whose possession, custody, or control the defendant properties are presently found, and to use whatever means may be appropriate to protect and maintain it in your custody until further order of this Court.”
Judge Kennedy issued the warrant of arrest in rem following a verified complaint for forfeiture in rem filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Districts of Guam and the NMI.
Filed on Dec. 30, 2022, the 21-page complaint did not provide the names of the defendants but refers to two Bank of Saipan accounts of “MCS”, which was incorporated by “A.Y.” for the stated purpose of “banking and financial services, real estate development, and business management.”
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, its complaint arises out of an investigation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service of a suspected conspiracy by foreign entities and entities and individuals in the CNMI to commit wire fraud and money laundering.
The suspected conspiracy also aimed “to evade the payment of the proper amount of income taxes owed to the CNMI government, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.”
On Nov. 7, 2019, the FBI executed search warrants at the Office of the Governor, casino investor Imperial Pacific International, and the office of Alfred Yue of Marianas Consultancy Services LLC, among other offices. Marianas Consultancy Services LLC was a consultant of IPI.
You might be interested in:
Sen. Rand Paul on Health Care and Civil Asset Forfeiture (7-20-17) | How police can take your stuff, sell it, and pay for armored cars with the money | Data Center M&A: Consolidation Shaping the Industry | A look into DHS asset forfeiture procedures | SLA Best Practices: Negotiations for Uptime, Redundancy, and Tenant Protections | Handling Security Breaches: Legal Action Steps for Data Centers | Another State Ends Civil Asset Forfeiture! | Federal Judge Effectively Ends Albuquerque’s Civil Asset Forfeiture Program as Too Focused on Revenue and Not on Due Process | Asset Forfeitures:The Free Market and Property Rights | DOJ Announces New Rules for Civil Asset Forfeiture | Congress Takes Positive Steps to Protect Property Owners From Asset Seizure | Retiree’s Home Taken for $8.41 Tax Bill Draws Michigan Supreme Court Ire | Civil Forfeiture Now Requires A Criminal Conviction In Montana And New Mexico | Civil Asset Forfeiture Still Abused by Florida Law Enforcement | The AI Data Center Boom: Scaling Infrastructure for the AI Revolution | DEA Forfeiture Appeals: Challenging Unjust Drug Asset Seizures | Five Myths of Civil Forfeiture | International Data Center Law: Cross-Border Operations & Jurisdictional Challenges | Civil Forfeiture: Part One | Monitoring Dark Fiber for Data Centers: Legal, Security, and Contractual Aspects | Civil Asset Forfeiture Corruption | Civil Forfeiture in Texas (3-3-22) | Creating Redundant Power and Network Infrastructure in Modern Data Centers | Operational Compliance for Data Centers: Ensuring Legal & Regulatory Adherence
Additional Reading:
Good and bad news on civil asset forfeiture | Supreme Court says states can’t impose excessive fines, and delivers a win to former heroin addict in pivotal ruling | DOJ Announces New Rules for Civil Asset Forfeiture | Understanding Lienholder Roles in Forfeiture Cases | Criminal Asset Recovery – Rucci Law | Scathing Report Reveals ICE Directive Encouraging Agents to Seize Property for Financial Gain | Civil Forfeiture: Can the Government Really Seize and Take Ownership of My Company’s Assets? | Montana Reins in Civil Asset Forfeiture | 18 U.S.C. § 981. CIVIL FORFEITURE | What is Civil Asset Forfeiture? | Iziah Explains | U.S. seeks $5.4 mln from Russian businessman Malofeyev’s account | Civil Forfeiture in Texas (3-3-22) | Fighting Civil Asset Forfeiture in San Diego – From Border Seizures to Local Police | Major Ruling On Civil Forfeiture | Professional Corporate Law Services Legal Services | Professional Securities Law Attorney Legal Services | Asset Forfeiture Transparency Strategies | Taken | NBC Discusses Need For Civil Forfeiture and How Congress Is Working to Stop Policing for Profit | Civil Asset Forfeiture and Structuring | Sheriff Under Scrutiny over Drug Money Spending | Half-A-Cheer For Supremes Civil Asset Forfeiture Ruling | Civil Forfeiture Injustice – Rucci Law | Pima County Sheriff – Talking With Civil Asset Forfeiture Recipient
