Alabama Passes Asset Forfeiture Accountability Bill

On Monday, June 10, 2019, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a bill into law, SB 191 which now imposes strict reporting requirements for all asset forfeiture cases in the state. The Tenth Amendment Center reports that this “legislation takes the first step that could lead to substantive reforms, including closing a federal loophole that allows police to bypass more strict state asset forfeiture laws.”

Alabama’s newly signed law requires law enforcement agencies in the state to write up detailed reports on every forfeiture carried out in the state. Mike Maharrey notes what this bill entails:

Poland Suggests Russian Missile Entered Airspace
Poland Suggests Russian Missile Entered Airspace
close
volume_off volume_up
Next
Stay

Auto (360p)
225p
360p
Subtitles Off
Subtitles EN
The new law requires Alabama law enforcement agencies to submit detailed reports on every forfeiture in the state, including information on whether there were any arrests in connection with the seizure, the disposition of cases, and how asset forfeiture proceeds were disbursed.

On top of that, this law also addresses asset forfeiture cases that involve the feds:

Trending: Thomas Massie Receives the Highest Score on the Republican Liberty Caucus’s Pro-Liberty Index

The legislation specifically directs the Criminal Justice Information Center Commission to establish rules for reporting asset forfeiture cases in cooperation with the federal government and when an Alabama law enforcement agency receives equitable sharing proceeds from a federal forfeiture case.

This bill was unanimously passed in both chambers of the Alabama State Legislature, receiving a 33-0 vote in the Senate and a 102-0 vote in the House. Although the passage of SB 191 doesn’t directly reform Alabama’s asset forfeiture laws, it does serve as a building block for future reforms. Through its increase in transparency, SB 191 enables Alabamians to witness what civil asset forfeiture entails. Such transparency can serve as a catalyst for future change.

The specific provision which requires documented reports of all cases handled by the federal government could lead to the closing of the “equitable sharing” loophole. Under equitable sharing, state and local police can circumvent strict state asset forfeiture laws in a large number of cases. Law enforcement agencies can bypass strict state forfeiture laws just by declaring they are federal in nature.

Not only do law enforcement agencies kick these policies off to the feds, but they’re able to get fat proceeds from these seizures. Civil asset forfeiture, a practice that raked $4 billion in seizures in 2014, is a racket and corrupt law enforcement agencies will do what it takes to maintain it.

Alabama’s recent forfeiture law is a good start, but future legislation should focus on tightening up Alabama’s forfeiture laws and closing the equitable sharing loophole.

Related:
Asset Forfeitures Fund New York DA’s Office Bonuses | Civil forfeiture: Fighting socialism in Mississippi and throughout the Deep South | Civil asset forfeiture in South Carolina is unconstitutional, circuit court judge rules | Colocation for Satellite Ground Stations: Regulatory & Infrastructure Challenges | Remote Hands Services: Defining Scope & Limiting Liabilities | Judge finds no rights violations in FBI seizure of Beverly Hills safe-deposit boxes | LA Times Articles on L.A. Safe Deposit Box Forfeiture Abuse | New Jersey Tightens Reins on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Protecting Sensitive Data: Security Strategies for Modern Facilities | Muskogee DA Drops $53K Civil Forfeiture Case | Sen. Lee Questions ATF Nominee on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Police seize property and cash in questionable raids | Data Center Interconnect and Global Networking: Ensuring High-Performance Connectivity | Data Center Site Selection: 5 Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them | Dallas County Member Protests Use of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Urban Reform | Atlanta Rapper Lost Thousands in Civil Forfeiture, but Fought Back and Won | Both parties in New Mexico and elsewhere see bad problems in good-intentioned civil forfeiture laws | Texas Asset Forfeiture Press Conference (Institute for Justice) | Airbnb ‘Tenant from Hell’ Who Allegedly Lived Rent-Free for 575 Days Leaves Property | Design-Build Approaches for Fast-Track Data Center Projects: Balancing Speed and Risk | Streamlining the Permitting Process for Data Center Development | IRS Forfeiture Appeals: Challenging Tax-Related Asset Seizures | Why Cops Should Be Chasing the Bad Guys, Not the Big Bucks | Global Data Center Market Trends and the Path Ahead

Additional Reading:
How Civil Forfeiture Can Enable Public Officials’ Misuse of Funds | Asset Seizure Defense California – Rucci Law | Seized Drug Assets Pad Police Budgets | Civil Asset Forfeiture “Has Created Serious Problems” | Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Forfeiture: Legal Defense for Drug Asset Seizures | How Cops Can Use Civil Asset Forfeiture To Get Your Stuff | Asset Forfeiture Evidence – Rucci Law | Kim Kardashian and Floyd Mayweather sued by investors over alleged crypto scam | Asset Forfeiture Defense Strategies | Warrant of arrest issued against seized funds from Bank of Saipan | New report: In tough times, police start seizing a lot more stuff from people | What to Do When Facing Civil Rights Violations | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-112.000 – Administrative And Judicial Forfeiture | Customs Seizures: Legal Strategies & Defense | The Supreme Court Has Limited How Much Private Property States Can Seize | The feds are helping local police make money by taking your stuff again | Russian oligarch ordered to forfeit $5.4 mln to U.S., Ukraine may get funds | How Police Departments Use Civil Forfeiture to Collect Billions | Supreme Court Limits Civil Forfeiture – LIVE COVERAGE | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-113.000 – Forfeiture Settlements | Did You Know That Sheriffs Use Civil Asset Forfeiture To Steal Your Money? | Police Seizure Attorney Los Angeles – Rucci Law | Rand Paul: How feds can legally steal your money | Civil Asset Forfeiture Triggers Excessive Fines Clause