Michigan Enacts Civil Asset Forfeiture Reforms
Three new laws in Michigan will limit property seizure practices in the state.
Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows law enforcement officers to take assets, such as money and automobiles, from individuals who are suspected of having been involved in illegal activity. Traditionally, law enforcement officials do not even have to charge the owner with a crime, and the owner must go to court to recover the property.
The new statutes prohibit police officers from seizing property for suspected drug crimes without first obtaining a conviction or plea agreement, in cases involving assets under $50,000. The measures also require the government to notify an individual if their property has been seized, and they place the burden on officials to prove the forfeiture is justified. If not, the property must be returned to the owner within 14 days.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed the three bills on May 9.
Need for Lawyers Remains
The new laws direct the State Court Administrative Office to develop a form for property owners to file a written objection regarding property seized without a warrant, and another form to petition the government to relinquish the property.
It will still be difficult for owners to recover their property when it is unjustly taken, says Lee McGrath, senior legislative counsel for the Institute for Justice.
“The average forfeiture is less than $2,000,” McGrath said. “It is irrational for a property owner to spend $5,000 on a lawyer to get back property worth less than the lawyer’s cost.
“It is equally irrational for legislators to believe that most citizens can use a form to answer a civil complaint in 20 days without the help of a lawyer,” McGrath said.
‘A Strong First Step’
Michigan law enforcement agencies benefit from asset forfeiture because they are allowed to sell the assets they have seized and use the funds, says Matthew Glans, a senior policy analyst at The Heartland Institute, which publishes Budget & Tax News.
“Michigan took a strong first step toward limiting the abuse of civil asset forfeiture by limiting its use in drug cases, which do represent a large portion of property seizures,” Glans said.
“Unfortunately, the new laws do not end the practice completely and do not address the incentives for law enforcement agencies to wrongfully seize property,” said Glans.
Equitable Sharing Loophole
Seizures through asset forfeiture in Michigan were estimated to total more than $13 million in cash and property in 2017, Budget & Tax News reported in April.
Legislators should take further action to limit the incentives for police to take people’s property, says Glans.
“Michigan lawmakers should build on these positive reforms and enact further new laws requiring seized funds to be directed toward education, crime prevention, or the general fund, not used by law enforcement agencies,” Glans said.
Police also share in the proceeds when federal agencies are involved, Glans says.
“[The Michigan Legislature] should also close the equitable sharing loophole and block local police agencies from working with federal authorities to sidestep state restrictions on forfeiture and dividing the seized assets between them,” said Glans.
Jake Grant (jakeg42294@gmail.com) writes from Alexandria, Virginia.
Internet Info
Matthew Glans, “Michigan Considers Partial Reform of Civil Asset Forfeiture,” Research & Commentary, The Heartland Institute, March 7: https://heartland.org/publications-resources/publications/research–commentary-michigan-considers-partial-reform-of-civil-asset-forfeiture
Related:
Montana Reins in Civil Asset Forfeiture | Customs & Border Protection (CBP) Seizures: Legal Defense for Border Forfeiture | Civil asset forfeiture in South Carolina is unconstitutional, circuit court judge rules | A look into DHS asset forfeiture procedures | My Voice: Private property at risk in South Dakota | PCI DSS in a Colocation Environment: Roles & Responsibilities | Mergers & Acquisitions in Data Centers: Legal Due Diligence & Deal Structuring | The FBI Seized Almost $1 Million From This Family—and Never Charged Them With a Crime | Reforming Civil Asset Forfeiture | After Having His Motel Seized by the Government, Victim of Civil Asset Forfeiture Reflects on His Fight | Understanding Data Center Tier Certifications: Meeting Uptime Requirements | The Debate over Civil Asset Forfeiture | How to Safeguard Your Assets Legally | Politician Victim of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Asset Forfeitures:The Free Market and Property Rights | Proactive Contract Enforcement: Avoiding Disputes in Data Center Deals | Senate Seeks New Standard in Asset Forfeiture Cases | Emerging Technologies & Data Center Law: Blockchain, Edge Computing & Legal Frontiers | Sheriff Indicted for Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuse | Navigating Data Center Land Use Entitlements: A Comprehensive Guide | Dallas Police Took $106,000 From a Traveler. They Haven’t Explained Why. | Data Center Boom | Data Center Mergers & Acquisitions: Post-Transaction Integration & Liabilities | Inside Civil Asset Forfeiture
You might also like:
Civil Asset Forfeiture – the Only Legal Form of Theft | Forfeited profits: Why the feds chronically undersell seized property | Government May Not Avoid Just Compensation in Debt Seizures | How Can We Stop Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws? | How to Navigate Asset Forfeiture Cases | Drug-Related Asset Forfeiture Defense Strategies | Supreme Court Could Stop The Federal Government From Not Paying Legal Fees | Great News: New Mexico’s Asset Forfeiture Reform Bill Signed by Governor | House Forfeiture Laws – Rucci Law | Feds auction $13.5M worth of Silk Road bitcoins | Arizona Legislature Passes Bill Requiring Convictions for Asset Forfeiture | Currency Structuring & Forfeiture: Legal Defense for IRS Seizures | Understanding Civil Rights: A Guide | Asset Return Negotiation Strategies | An Overview of Recent State-Level Forfeiture Reforms | Why Cops Should Be Chasing the Bad Guys, Not the Big Bucks | Rashida Tlaib Slams Extremely Outrageous Practice Of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Civil Asset Forfeiture: Unconstitutional As Applied | Federal Forfeiture Court – Rucci Law | Who’s winning from asset seizures? | Oregon Seizes $121,000 of Deceased Veteran’s Benefits | Middle District Of Florida U.S. Attorney’s Office Collects More Than $168 Million In Civil And Criminal Actions In Fiscal Year 2022 | Civil Asset Forfeiture “Has Created Serious Problems” | Asset Forfeitures Fund New York DA’s Office Bonuses
