Loophole Lets Missouri Cops Keep Millions in Forfeiture Funds (and Away from Schools)

Under a civil forfeiture loophole, Missouri law enforcement agencies have diverted millions of dollars in seized assets away from a fund for public schools, instead retaining those funds for their own use. A new report by the Missouri State Auditor found that police had seized over $6.2 million worth of property in 2016. Of those seizures, $2.7 million, or nearly 45 percent, were transferred to a federal agency. Less than $100,000—a mere two percent—was transferred to the state to benefit public education, in accordance with Missouri state law. Auditors also reported that less than half of all seizures were accompanied by criminal charges.

The Show-Me State is one of a mere half dozen states that bans law enforcement from retaining any forfeiture proceeds. Instead, as outlined by the state constitution, “the clear proceeds of all penalties, forfeitures and fines collected…shall be distributed annually to the schools.” Missouri is also just one of 12 states that requires a criminal conviction before property can be forfeited.

But those provisions do not apply to federal law, which has laxer protections for property owners. Through a program known as “equitable sharing,” state and local agencies can partner with a federal agency and litigate to forfeit the property federally. If they prevail, police and prosecutors can collect up to 80 percent of the proceeds, even if that circumvents Missouri law.

On Tuesday, the Missouri House of Representatives is expected to hold a hearing on a bill that would curtail equitable sharing. Introduced by Rep. Shamed Dogan, HB 231 would ban law enforcement from transferring or referring seized property to a federal agency, unless the property involves cash in amounts over $100,000. Dogan’s legislation would not prevent law enforcement from seizing contraband or property believed to be “the proceeds or instruments of a crime.”

Similar reform measures have already been enacted in five states and the District of Columbia, while comparable bills have advanced in Arizona and New Hampshire this year.

Writing in National Review last summer, Dogan called on his fellow lawmakers to “end for-profit policing.” “Civil-asset forfeiture causes too many people’s lives and treasure to be put at risk for the sake of increasing government revenues.”

You might be interested in:
South Carolina Supreme Court drops the ball on asset forfeiture reform | Biometric Access Controls in Data Centers: Balancing Security & Privacy | Civil Asset Forfeiture – Shooting Straight | Civil Forfeiture in Texas (3-3-22) | Serverless in Data Centers: Contractual, Security, and Scalability Considerations | Federal Civil Asset Forfeiture | Addressing Insider Threats in Data Centers: Policies, Background Checks, and Monitoring | The Forfeiture Machine Turns Cops into Robbers | John Oliver Cannot Believe Cops Use Civil Forfeiture Laws To Rob American Citizens of Thousands of $ | International Data Residency: Meeting Localization Laws & Minimizing Risks | Attorney General Sessions Announces Policy to Increase Civil Forfeiture | How do you protect your assets from seizures and forfeitures? | Data Center Mergers & Acquisitions: Post-Transaction Integration & Liabilities | Hybrid IT Strategies: Legal and Security Considerations for On-Prem, Colo, and Cloud Mix | Op-Ed: State seizure of private property – How civil asset forfeiture has run amok in Louisiana | FBI Uses “Cute” Propaganda Campaign to Justify Civil Asset Forfeiture | Supreme Court Could Stop The Federal Government From Not Paying Legal Fees | Decommissioning Outdated Cooling Systems: Environmental Permits and Recycling | DEA Forfeiture Appeals: Challenging Unjust Drug Asset Seizures | Tenant Code of Conduct: Managing Damaging or Illegal Activities in Data Centers | How to Safeguard Your Assets Legally | FBI Gets TRO’ed for Abusive Civil Forfeiture – Viva Frei Vlawg | What the President Should Do: Civil Asset Forfeiture (CATO Institute) | Comedy: Law & Order Civil Asset Forfeiture Unit

Additional Reading:
Fake Reform Won’t Fix Police Addiction To Forfeiture Cash | Innocent Owner Defense | IRS Forfeiture Appeals: Challenging Tax-Related Asset Seizures | FBI Seized Almost $1 Million From Family, Without Charges – FoxNews | Civil Asset Forfeiture: Overdue Reforms | This Federal Program Lets Cops Seize Cash, Evade State Laws And Keep Over A Billion Dollars | IRS Forfeiture & Seizures: Tax-Related Asset Recovery Defense | What is Civil Asset Forfeiture? | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-119.000 – Asset Forfeiture Approval, Consultation, And Notification Requirements | Asset Forfeiture Constitutional Rights – Rucci Law | Countering Civil Forfeiture Myths with Facts | Albany district attorney, sheriff under federal review for use of funds | UNCAC Asset Recovery: A Comprehensive Guide | $3 Million Federal Court Settlement: Philadelphia Agrees to End Civil Forfeiture | Clarence Thomas vs. Jeff Sessions on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Expungement After Forfeiture: Protecting Your Rights | Circuit Court Forfeiture Defense Strategies | County Sheriff Slapped with Civil Forfeiture Lawsuit | Eric Holder BANS Civil Forfeiture…Kind Of. | How to Protect Your Business from Legal Risks | New Study Finds Forfeiture Doesn’t Fight Crime, Is Used to Raise Revenue | The Role of Advocacy in Civil Rights | Civil Forfeiture Laws And The Continued Assault On Private Property | Report: Civil Forfeiture Policy Unjustly Deprives People of Property