Op-Ed: State seizure of private property – How civil asset forfeiture has run amok in Louisiana

Imagine you are driving home from work one day and are stopped and your car and personal belongings are taken. While this alone is a terrifying thought, it is more horrific when you realize that it isn’t a criminal that is taking your belongings but it’s an officer of the law. Unfortunately, this isn’t just a story, but a real practice called civil asset forfeiture that impacts countless Louisianans.

Civil asset forfeiture laws allow the government to seize and take title to personal property without charging or convicting the property owner of a crime. Louisiana’s forfeiture laws come up short of the freedoms we should be guaranteed.

If a property owner is acquitted of a crime, they could still lose their property because the state separates the forfeiture from the criminal trial process. Further, the standard of proof for civil forfeiture is lower than “beyond a reasonable doubt,” giving the government more latitude to take one’s property with relative ease. As Louisiana fell behind in protecting individual liberty, four states have replaced civil forfeiture with criminal forfeiture and 32 states changed their laws to remove some of the more problematic components of civil forfeiture.

The Pelican Institute’s newly released report found that from 2000 to 2020, the government seized a yearly average of almost $9 million in assets – totaling over $186 million over two decades. Furthermore, the state’s lackluster reporting standards spell a real mystery for uncovering just how much of this property was acquired with a corresponding criminal conviction.

The property that is seized is disbursed between local law enforcement agencies. Sixty percent goes to the seizing law enforcement agency, 20% goes to district attorney’s offices involved in the forfeiture, and another 20% goes to the criminal court fund. Since courts, district attorneys, and law enforcement get a portion of what is seized, an incentive has been created that encourages more of this seizure of private property. Further, the cost of retaining legal counsel often exceeds the value of property seized, making it a fruitless endeavor to contest a forfeiture even when innocent.

Proponents of civil asset forfeiture believe it’s fundamental to fighting and discouraging crime. There’s some truth to this. Criminals like drug dealers and human smugglers should be deprived of their ill-gotten gains. There are rare circumstances when the accused reside outside of the jurisdiction of Louisiana courts and civil forfeitures may be a necessity to compel cooperation. However, there’s no reason to handle this outside the criminal process for everyday Louisianans and Americans that can be extradited and held to account.

The Pelican Institute’s report outlines several ways to rein in the practice of civil asset forfeiture in Louisiana. For example, switching to criminal forfeiture and requiring a conviction for the accused party would be just as effective as civil forfeiture while offering more protection for the innocent and falsely accused. Also, setting a minimum value for property eligible to be seized would help protect low-income property owners. Another solution is putting all forfeiture-related funds into a neutral account such as the state general fund or education fund, removing any incentive to engage in for-profit policing. Solutions like these would allow law enforcement to continue their duties without infringing on the rights of Louisianans.

Louisianans have a right to the security of their persons and property. Unfortunately, Louisiana’s current status quo of civil asset forfeiture runs afoul of the core values of a free society. The government should protect life, liberty, and property – not threaten it. Burdening private citizens with petitioning the state for the return of their possessions goes against the core purpose of the presumption of innocence.

You might also like:
Key Legal Considerations in Data Center Service Agreements | Fortune or forfeiture: real estate lending in the cannabis space | Another Win Against Civil Asset Forfeiture! | What is Civil Asset Forfeiture? | Will a tech giant’s huge appetite transform a vibrant slice of Manhattan? | New Study Finds Forfeiture Doesn’t Fight Crime, Is Used to Raise Revenue | Global Data Center Market Trends and the Path Ahead | Politician Victim of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Data Privacy Laws Every Data Center Operator Should Know | Emerging Markets: Growth Opportunities in Asia’s Data Center Sector | After the Cops Seized Her Car, the Government Waited Five Years Before Giving Her a Chance To Get It Back | Civil Forfeiture Now Requires A Criminal Conviction In Montana And New Mexico | Divestitures & Carve-outs in Data Centers: Legal Strategies for Asset Separation | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Twelfth in a Series: Love Field Update) | In Rem Warrant of Arrest | An Airbnb Tenant From Hell – Business Insider | Civil Asset Forfeiture – Shooting Straight | Data Center SLA Essentials: Crafting Bulletproof Agreements | Top Legal Tips for Business Owners | Massachusetts Worst in Nation for Civil Forfeiture Laws | Massachusetts Remains a Civil Forfeiture Outlier | Integrating Green Initiatives: Sustainability in Modern Data Centers | DEA & TSA Take $82,000 Life Savings From Pittsburgh Retiree | Remote Hands Services: Defining Scope & Limiting Liabilities

Additional Reading:
How and When Will I Get Back Property Seized by Police? | Motion to Suppress in CAFRA Forfeiture Cases | Asset Forfeiture Unit Criticized | SA’s Corruption Emergency | Civil Forfeiture Due Process – Rucci Law | An Indiana man was caught with $260 of heroin. The state took his $42,000 Land Rover. | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-116.000 – Equitable Sharing And Federal Adoption | Massachusetts Worst in Nation for Civil Forfeiture Laws | Arizona Legislature Passes Bill Requiring Convictions for Asset Forfeiture | Reasonable limits on asset forfeiture past-due | Asset Forfeiture Defense Strategies for Smuggled Goods | State Forfeiture Laws: A Comprehensive Guide | It Was a Good Week to Fight Civil Asset Forfeiture | Innocent Owner Rights – Rucci Law | Reforming Civil Asset Forfeiture | FBI Seizures and Forfeitures | A Comparison of Federal Civil and Criminal Forfeiture Procedures: Which Provides More Protections for Property Owners? | Civil Asset Forfeiture Used as Leverage by State | Drug Asset Forfeiture California – Rucci Law | Forfeited profits: Why the feds chronically undersell seized property | This Week in Civil Forfeiture Outrages | Forfeiture Legal Rights – Rucci Law | Civil Asset Forfeiture and Structuring | Maine Now Requires Criminal Conviction Before Property May Be Forfeited | FBI Seizures and Forfeitures