Stopping the abuse of civil forfeiture

The writer, a Republican, represents Michigan’s 7th Congressional District in the U.S. House.

Imagine you are driving down the highway on your way to buy a car. You spent months researching years, makes and models, and you finally found somebody who was selling the exact ride you were looking for at a reasonable price. Suddenly, police pull you over for allegedly going 37 mph in a 35 mph zone. Upon discovering the $8,500 in cash you have on hand, the officers take you to jail and threaten to charge you with money laundering unless you turn over the money. Frightened, you give it to them.

Make sense of the news fast with our daily newsletter
This may sound like something out of a Hollywood movie, but it’s a true story, and incidents like it happen all too often across the country because of our civil forfeiture laws.

Fortunately, the victim in the above story, Roderick Daniels, had his property returned by officials due to media attention and legal pressure. But the power to take property without due process continues to be abused by local, state and federal law enforcement officials. In my state of Michigan, grocery store owner Terry Dehko had his bank account seized by the IRS because it suspected him of being a money launderer. Dehko would make cash deposits in the bank across the street every night to reduce the threat of robbery and because of coverage limits on his store’s insurance policy. Charges were never filed, but Dehko had to fight in court to prove that his money was not being used in a criminal enterprise.

Many of the abuses occur at the state and local levels, but the federal government encourages them through “equitable-sharing partnerships,” a practice that allows police agencies to circumvent state laws that might otherwise tie their hands. Nebraska has some of the strongest anti-forfeiture laws in the country, but in 2003, the local police used equitable sharing to work with federal officials to seize $124,700 in cash from Emiliano Gonzolez under the federal government’s lesser legal standard of proof. Gonzolez was never charged with a crime, but he lost his cash, which he had intended to use to buy a refrigerated truck for a produce business.

Share this article
Share
In a country founded on principles of due process and property rights, no one should be comfortable with a system that allows law enforcement to seize personal property without a finding of guilt or, in many cases, even leveling a criminal charge. More states are looking into reforming their forfeiture laws, and this year Minnesota became the latest to push back against such abuses. However, as long as equitable sharing remains an option for local officials who want to work around state laws, such reforms will be nullified. The profit motive is too strong. Last year, equitable-sharing agreements funneled $600 million to police budgets. Clearly, with the size of the federal Asset Forfeiture Fund exceeding $2 billion in 2013, civil forfeiture is big business for the government.

In response to these abuses, I recently introduced the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act, which would raise the level of proof of a substantial nexus to criminal activity that must be met before property can be seized. The legislation would also bolster the “innocent owner defense” by requiring the government to show that an owner was aware that property was being used in criminal activity. Finally, along with imposing greater reporting requirements on the Justice Department, the bill would require the attorney general to certify that equitable-sharing agreements are not entered into simply to get around state laws that would prohibit a forfeiture. These common-sense reforms can help restore the balance of power between the government and its citizens.

Policing is a necessary and vital element of an orderly society, and the large majority of our law enforcement personnel do difficult work with great professionalism and integrity — but our constitutional framework emphasizes the need to uphold individual rights above all. We should not accept a system in which Americans must live in fear that their property could be seized by those whose chief mission should be to serve and protect.

Additional Reading:
Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong. | Fighting Back against Government Theft | Unlocking the “Stargate” Initiative: How Imperial Data Center Can Power America’s AI Future | Judge dismisses case over FBI raid of 1,400 private safe-deposit boxes and seizure of millions in jewelry and cash | Data Center SLA Negotiations: Tips for Achieving Mutual Benefit and Transparency | Texas Asset Forfeiture Press Conference (Institute for Justice) | Bridging the Talent Gap: Solving the Data Center Skills Shortage | Arizona Legislature Passes Bill Requiring Convictions for Asset Forfeiture | HIPAA-Compliant Data Centers: Legal Requirements & Best Practices | An Airbnb Tenant From Hell – Business Insider | End Civil Asset Forfeiture | Building a Strong Legal Foundation for Your Business | Petitions for Remission & Mitigation: Administrative Relief from Forfeiture | Rep. Travis Grantham Explains HB2810 to Reform Civil Asset Forfeiture (2-17-21) | Bank Deposits, Structuring, and Asset Forfeitures | Wisconsin Enacts Sweeping Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Atlanta Rapper Lost Thousands in Civil Forfeiture, but Fought Back and Won | Maine Now Requires Criminal Conviction Before Property May Be Forfeited | Data Center M&A: Consolidation Shaping the Industry | Washington State: SB 5044- Civil Asset Forfeiture | Trends in Data Center Mergers and Acquisitions: Legal Frameworks and Market Shifts | The Evolving Role of Chief Data Officer (CDO) in Data Centers: Governance & Accountability | SB 70: Shining More Light on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Smart PDUs & Data Center Power Management: Legal & Operational Insights

You might also like:
Motion to Suppress in CAFRA Forfeiture Cases | Home Asset Forfeiture – Rucci Law | Taken | Business Asset Forfeiture Los Angeles – Rucci Law | These states let police take and keep your stuff even if you haven’t committed a crime | Statute of Limitations in Forfeiture Cases | Ending Government’s Civil Asset Forfeiture Theft of Property One State at a Time | Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Forfeiture: Legal Defense for Drug Asset Seizures | Fourth Amendment Seizures: Attorney Rucci’s Guide | Civil Asset Forfeiture “Has Created Serious Problems” | Legal Insights: Civil Rights Case Studies | Civil Asset Forfeiture – An Update on Recent Events in Wyoming | Civil asset forfeiture is a dangerous tool | Why Rhode Island Needs Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Civil Asset Forfeiture in 60 Seconds | Op-Ed: State seizure of private property – How civil asset forfeiture has run amok in Louisiana | What is Civil Asset Forfeiture? | Texas Case May Spur Drug Money Rule Change | Interpol Asset Seizures: A Legal Overview | What is Civil Forfeiture? | As Civil Forfeiture Faces Statewide Reform, Some Departments Are Making Changes Now | A Judge Tells the FBI It Can’t Keep Millions in Loot Seized from a Beverly Hills Vault | Another State Ends Civil Asset Forfeiture! | Charlotte Is Ground Zero for New FBI Asset Forfeiture Tip Line Program