Wisconsin Enacts Sweeping Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill protecting residents’ constitutional rights to property and due process.
Senate Bill 61 (S.B. 61), sponsored by state Sen. David Craig (R-Town of Vernon), sets new requirements for law enforcement agencies and prosecutors in using civil asset forfeiture to take ownership of individuals’ seized assets or property.
In most cases, police or prosecutors now must obtain a criminal conviction before property held by individuals accused of committing a crime can be forfeited. The law went into effect on April 5.
Cops, Not Robbers
Lindsey Stroud, state government relations manager for The Heartland Institute, which publishes Budget & Tax News, says many law enforcement agencies have routinely abused the civil asset forfeiture process.
“It’s a problem because, in a lot of these states, if you’re an innocent person, your property can be taken away from you,” Stroud said. “A lot of these laws allow the law enforcement agencies to retain what they take, so it kind of creates an incentive for them.”
Restoring Principles of Justice
Craig says the bill he introduced, now known as Act 211, restores the presumption of innocence in this area of Wisconsin law and clarifies due process.
“Senate Bill 61 requires a criminal conviction prior to forfeiture of property with some limited exceptions, preserving the fundamental notion that one is innocent until proven guilty,” Craig said. “Additionally, the legislation requires that forfeiture be proportional to the offence, that innocent owners are protected, forfeiture actions are properly reported and transparent, and divests the monetary incentives for departments to pursue forfeitures.”
Stroud says civil asset forfeiture can harm innocent individuals in unforeseen ways.
“In one case, a woman went to bail her son out,” Stroud said. “They took a drug-sniffing dog, sniffed her money, and they seized it. Studies show that 90 percent of bills have traces of drugs on them. She was eventually able to prove she got the money legally”.
‘Glaring Violation’ of Constitution
Craig says lawmakers at every level should work to stop constitutional abuses at the hands of the government.
“Frankly, civil asset forfeiture affects every American,” Craig said. “The mere fact that Wisconsin law allowed private property to be forfeited to the government without conviction was a glaring violation of the Constitution. So long as a practice grossly violates the Constitution and can be used against anyone, that is a mandate that elected officials sworn to uphold the Constitution must remedy.”
Public Responsibility
Craig says the public must be vigilant in fighting for liberty and freedom.
“All citizens should care when their liberties guaranteed by the Bill of Rights are threatened by an overzealous government,” Craig said. “These abusive policies could someday be used against you, despite no wrongdoing on your part.”
Additional Reading:
Quantum Computing Colocation: Emerging Legal Frameworks & IP Considerations | Motion to Suppress in Forfeiture Cases | Indiana Solicitor General: It’s Constitutional to Seize a Car for Driving 5 MPH Over the Speed Limit | 5G-Enabled Data Centers: Legal Considerations and Deployment Models | International Staffing: Cross-Border Employment Rules for Data Center Technicians | Legal Due Diligence Checklist for Data Center Acquisitions | Highway Robbers Return Money Taken from Ex-Marine The Catch? They Were Cops | Police Seize Weapons in Civil Asset Forfeiture Case | Data Privacy in the Data Center: A Guide to Compliance | Feds charge 21 people in global crypto money laundering bust | Protecting Your Business: Legal Strategies | How the government can steal your stuff: 6 questions about civil asset forfeiture answered | Warrant of arrest issued against seized funds from Bank of Saipan | Risk Assessments in Data Centers: Balancing Physical, Cyber, and Operational Threats | LA Times Articles on L.A. Safe Deposit Box Forfeiture Abuse | The Continuing Perversity of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Will the feds bungle billions? | Colocation Mergers: Antitrust Laws and Market Competition for Data Centers | An Overview of Recent State-Level Forfeiture Reforms | Condo board looks to evict buyer of heavily discounted 1MDB penthouse | Airbnb ‘tenant from hell’ who squatted for 500 days and wouldn’t leave unless owner payed $100,000 moves out | Attorney Fees under CAFRA | Network Edge & Micro Data Centers: Emerging Legal Challenges | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-120.000 – Attorney Fee Forfeiture Guidelines
You might be interested in:
Civil Forfeiture | Over $455,000 Seized from Medical Marijuana Patient Slapped with Civil Asset Forfeiture | Supreme Court Limits Police Powers to Seize Private Property | Civil Forfeiture Now Requires A Criminal Conviction In Montana And New Mexico | DEA Continues to Seize Money Without Proof of Criminality | Bennis v. Michigan, Supreme Court OKs Civil Forfeiture | Institute for Justice’s Darpana Sheth Discusses Civil Asset Forfeiture | Rand Paul – Civil Asset Forfeiture | Legal Safeguards Every Business Needs | Asset Forfeiture Legal Resources | What is Civil Forfeiture and Why Has It Become Controversial? | How Civil Asset Forfeiture Turns Authorities into ‘Bounty Hunters’ | Professional High Profile Forfeiture Cases Legal Services | FASCISTIC Civil Asset Forfeiture MUST STOP | The Supreme Court Has Limited How Much Private Property States Can Seize | Police Can Take Your Money Through Civil Forfeiture | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Eighth in a Series) | New report: In tough times, police start seizing a lot more stuff from people | Cryptocurrency Forfeiture: When the Government Seizes Digital Assets | Civil Forfeiture Reform – Rucci Law | These states let police take and keep your stuff even if you haven’t committed a crime | Asset Forfeiture is Theft: An Overview of the State and Federal Programs | Warrant of Arrest in Rem | Mooresville Police Face Legal Fight Over Cash Seized From Suspects
