FBI Uses “Cute” Propaganda Campaign to Justify Civil Asset Forfeiture
You can’t make this up.
The FBI is normalizing the concept of civil asset forfeiture by using videos with cute puppies.
On June 25, 2019, the FBI tweeted a video of cute puppies to sell people on the idea of draconian civil asset forfeiture laws. In the tweet it stated, “civil forfeiture laws are helping the FBI and its partners get dogs rescued from dogfighting rings positioned to be treated, rehabilitated, and moved into better situations.”
CIVIL FORFEITURE LAWS ARE HELPING THE FBI AND ITS PARTNERS GET DOGS RESCUED FROM DOGFIGHTING RINGS POSITIONED TO BE TREATED, REHABILITATED, AND MOVED INTO BETTER SITUATIONS.
— FBI (@FBI) JUNE 25, 2019
Such cute imagery may make people have second thoughts about civil asset forfeiture, but when we dig deep into this practice, we realize that it’s legalized theft by another name.
Missouri
It’s no secret that civil asset forfeiture is one of the most polemical issues in America. In sum, it’s “a process by which the government can take and sell your property without ever convicting, or even charging, you with a crime.”
Because civil asset forfeiture is a strictly civil matter, defendants do not have the same protections as criminal defendants. Even if an individual is not found guilty of a crime, this does not guarantee that the government will return their property. Indeed, no one likes high taxes, so municipal governments and their law enforcement counterparts will get crafty in finding ways to raise revenue for the government.
Civil asset forfeiture is the go-to strategy for cash-strapped municipalities to collective revenue when conventional tax-raising methods may not be politically convenient. This has been a lucrative endeavor for law enforcement agencies, who’ve pocketed a cool $4.5 billion from this practice in 2014.
Under civil asset forfeiture, the state can seize items such as cars, cash, and real estate are all fair game. These items can be confiscated merely on the suspicion that an individual used them while committing a criminal act. Due process is not respected because of the fact that criminal convictions are not necessary for property to not be seized.
The FBI’s publication of this video may appear cute, but it’s nothing but propaganda. It ultimately gives a blatantly unconstitutional practice a rosy image. We must see through this ruse and understand that civil asset forfeiture must be put to an end if we want to live in a truly free society.
You might also like:
Innocent Owner Defense | Who’s winning from asset seizures? | Sessions Creates DOJ Asset Forfeiture Watchdog | Will the feds bungle billions? | Asset Forfeiture is Theft: An Overview of the State and Federal Programs | A dysfunctional civil-forfeiture system seizes savings, destroys lives | How Cops Can Use Civil Asset Forfeiture To Get Your Stuff | District Attorneys and Civil Asset Forfeiture | Environmental Impact of Liquid Cooling Systems: Legal Considerations | Modular Data Centers: Legal and Regulatory Challenges | Maine Now Requires Criminal Conviction Before Property May Be Forfeited | Legal Due Diligence Checklist for Data Center Acquisitions | The Evolving Role of Chief Data Officer (CDO) in Data Centers: Governance & Accountability | Security Best Practices for Remote Data Center Hands: Vetting, Training, and Oversight | Magazine Articles on Forfeiture Abuses | The Bronx Defenders – Civil Forfeiture | Innocent People Fall Victim to Civil Forfeiture | eDiscovery Hosting: Minimizing Litigation Risks in Data Centers | U.S. seeks to seize 280 cryptocurrency accounts tied to North Korean hacks | Disaster Recovery & Business Continuity Planning for Mission-Critical Data Centers | Navigating Data Center Land Use Entitlements: A Comprehensive Guide | Kansas Asset Forfeiture Investigation Part 1 | Rand Paul Slams Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws | Lessons from Landmark Civil Rights Cases
Related Posts:
Civil Asset Forfeiture: Grading the States | New Study Finds Forfeiture Doesn’t Fight Crime, Is Used to Raise Revenue | Deputy AG Rosenstein on Civil Forfeiture, Mandatory Minimums | Two Celebrities Charged With Unlawfully Touting Coin Offerings | Professional Bank Asset Recovery Attorney Legal Services | Return of Seized Funds: A Comprehensive Guide | Bank Seizure Attorney California – Rucci Law | Over $455,000 Seized from Medical Marijuana Patient Slapped with Civil Asset Forfeiture | Vehicle Forfeiture Defense – Rucci Law | Asset Forfeiture is Theft: An Overview of the State and Federal Programs | Inside Civil Asset Forfeiture | Clarence Thomas vs. Jeff Sessions on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Supreme Court Limits Police Powers to Seize Private Property | Can the Trump Administration Use Asset Forfeiture Funds to Build the Border Wall? | Professional 23 Bar Admissions Attorney Legal Services | Op-Ed: Weak reforms allow Arkansas police to patrol for cash | Legal Trends for Small Businesses in 2026 | Senate bill aims to rein in IRS on asset forfeitures | Montana Reins in Civil Asset Forfeiture | Petitions for Remission & Mitigation: Administrative Relief from Forfeiture | The Bronx Defenders – Civil Forfeiture | International Treaty Asset Recovery | Navigating the Complexities of Asset Forfeiture | Taken


![original[1]](https://ruccilaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/original1.jpg)

![government-cash-seize[1]](https://ruccilaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/government-cash-seize1.jpg)
![20180903_d2c5ea2e-0888-57b3-b04a-ab689f32c70c_1[1]](https://ruccilaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/20180903_d2c5ea2e-0888-57b3-b04a-ab689f32c70c_11.jpg)




