North Dakota Takes A Bite Out Of Civil Asset Forfeiture

On May 2, 2019, North Dakota took a major first step in civil asset forfeiture reform. Governor Doug Burgum signed House Bill 1286, which goes a long way in limiting law enforcement agencies’ ability to arrest people, seize their property, and keep what they’ve seized even in cases where no crime can be proven.

Over the years, civil asset forfeiture has gained notoriety in criminal justice reform circles. Generally speaking, civil asset forfeiture has been a proven tactic in the so-called “War on Drugs” to target the assets of affluent drug lords.

However, as witnessed with countless other government programs, civil asset forfeiture has devolved into a money grab for corrupt law enforcement bureaucracies.

Scott Shackford of Reason points out that civil asset forfeiture “has instead grown into a massively corrupt mechanism where police agencies pull people over or raid their houses on whatever pretext the cops can muster.” According to the Reason writer, “North Dakota’s rules were particularly bad for the citizens.”

In fact, North Dakota is one of the worst states when it comes to civil asset forfeiture. It received a dishonorable F grade in the Institute for Justice’s “Policing for Profit” report. The only other state that received such an abysmal score was Massachusetts.

According to Shackford, “North Dakota’s rules were particularly bad for the citizens.” Before HB 1286 received the Governor’s signature, law enforcement just needed to have probable cause in order to make a property seizure attempt. Law enforcement agencies could even keep up to 100 percent of the properties they seized as long as it was worth less than $200,000.

With HB 1286 in place, police must obtain a conviction before seizing people’s assets. However, there are exemptions if the person is dead, has been deported, has disappeared, or has abandoned their property.

Although the bill sponsor, State Representative Rick Becker, was disappointed with the way the bill was watered down, he is considering putting a question on the ballot in 2020 that would strengthen the rules for asset forfeiture. Nonetheless, HB 1286 is a good first step.

The Supreme Court recently issued a ruling that limits states’ power to levy excessive fines and use civil asset forfeiture to take property.

There’s no question civil asset forfeiture is a promising fight for liberty activists. In times when it appears that government is growing non-stop, small victories like these give us a glimmer of hope. It’s also another reminder that state legislatures should never be ignored because these are the places where we can make the most change.

Related:
Justice Thomas Defends Victims of Policing for Profit | International Data Center Law: Cross-Border Operations & Jurisdictional Challenges | Rand Paul Slams Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws | Mike Stenhouse — Civil Asset Forfeiture | Ban on Purchasing Certain Equipment with Equitable Sharing Funds | Data Sovereignty and Localization: Compliance Challenges for Global Data Centers | Missouri Asset Forfeiture | Energy Storage Solutions & Battery Innovations for Data Centers: A Sustainable Future | Emergency Power Innovations in Data Centers | Civil Forfeiture (Shorter Version) | FBI Seeks Civil Forfeiture of Safe Deposit Box Contents | Major Ruling On Civil Forfeiture | Michigan Rolled Back Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Precision Cooling for High-Density Racks: Compliance and Warranty Issues | Financial Data Centers: SEC Regulations, FINRA Rules, and Best Practices | Russian oligarch ordered to forfeit $5.4 mln to U.S., Ukraine may get funds | AOC Discovers the Horrors of Civil Asset Forfeiture, Rails Against the Practice in Congressional Hearing | This Is How the Government Robs the Innocent | Civil Asset Forfeiture | Serverless in Data Centers: Contractual, Security, and Scalability Considerations | John Stossel – Civil Asset Forfeiture | Legal Safeguards Every Business Needs | Data Center Digital Twins: Contractual Obligations & IP Ownership | When Government Can Seize Your Property | What Is Civil Forfeiture? | Cash Seizures by Police Prompt Court Fights

Additional Reading:
How the Feds Are Using Civil Asset Forfeiture to Threaten Free Speech | Why It’s Impossible to Win a Forfeiture Case (Steve Lehto) | John Oliver Civil Asset Forfeiture Clip | Yes, the government can steal your stuff | Rashida Tlaib Slams Extremely Outrageous Practice Of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Asset Forfeitures Fund New York DA’s Office Bonuses | Fighting Asset Forfeiture Abuse | How Police Departments Use Civil Forfeiture to Collect Billions | Christie on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Seizure of Bitcoin for Civil Asset Forfeiture | Property Recovery Attorney – Rucci Law | Indiana Supreme Court Finally Puts an End to the Timbs Asset Forfeiture Case— “Reminiscent of Captain Ahab’s Chase of the White Whale Moby Dick” | Professional Business Contract Lawyer Legal Services | Justice Thomas Defends Victims of Policing for Profit | Does Civil Asset Forfeiture Violate Fourth Amendment Rights? | Civil Asset Forfeiture: Unconstitutional As Applied | Middle District Of Florida U.S. Attorney’s Office Collects More Than $168 Million In Civil And Criminal Actions In Fiscal Year 2022 | Feds auction $13.5M worth of Silk Road bitcoins | Professional Franchise Law Attorney Legal Services | Sebastian Rucci – American Greed Episode 12 – Season 8 | Forfeiture & Money Laundering: Legal Defense for Financial Crimes | Timelines for Forfeiture Cases: A Comprehensive Guide | IRS Forfeiture Appeals: Challenging Tax-Related Asset Seizures | Seized Asset Constitutional Rights – Rucci Law